go here In a recent Channel 4 interview with ‘controversial’ Canadian professor and clinical psychologist Jordan Peterson, the neo-Marxist and radical feminist news anchor Cathy Newman, crumbled in front of the world as the duo debated topics like the gender pay gap, ‘the patriarchy’, and other patently false neo-Marxist narratives pushed by the leftist, elitist and internationalist mainstream media.
https://gotblpirate.com/moscow-nagorny.html During the interview, Peterson rendered reporter Cathy Newman completely speechless after she inquired why an individual’s right to freedom of speech should trump another’s ‘right’ not to be offended.
https://starfixdope.com/praga-chehiya-kupit-kokain-geroin-mdma-ekstazi-mef-mefedron-amfetamin-gashish-shishki-boshki.html Professor Peterson responded with agility saying, “Because, in order to be able to think, you have to risk being offensive. I mean, look at the conversation we’re having right now. You’re certainly willing to risk offending me in the pursuit of truth. Why should you have the right to do that? It’s been rather uncomfortable.”
go to link The debate regarding freedom of speech was initially inspired as a result of Peterson’s prolific refusal to capitulate to authoritarian far left’s demands to dominate language and discourse. During the interview, Peterson defiantly explained that he is, “not going to cede the linguistic territory to radical leftists, regardless of whether or not it was put into law.”
Throughout the interview, Professor Peterson, a highly empathetic individual of exquisite learning and experience, remained cool, calm and collected as he was constantly bombarded with not just fallacious straw man arguments, but with vicious ad-hominem attacks as well.
If Channel 4 had any sense whatsoever, which in all likelihood they do not, they would take down this video as soon as possible as it wholly discredits their commonly espoused narratives. Furthermore, Cathy Newman should probably just quit altogether as a ‘reporter.’ It’s difficult to think of an interview which has been more tragically ruinous for the interviewer.